Like the late Jim Valvano’s 1983 NC State basketball team. Yet on the other, we also seem to love the hard-working underdog. Like the Sarah Changs and Jennifer Capriatis of the world. So on one hand, we seem to love the prodigy, for whom things appear to come easily, early, and effortlessly.

In comparing the relative merits of a 19-year old 6’11” small forward from Siberia who is unproven, but oozes potential with 3-point shooting range, the dribbling ability of a point guard, and shot-blocking skills thanks to a 7’6” wingspan, versus a 22-year old 4-year starter from Duke who led his team to consecutive NCAA championship games, fans and teams alike both seem to have a strong bias towards potential and a higher ceiling over proven achievement, effort, and dedication.īut then we express admiration for athletes like Hall of Fame NFL wide receiver Jerry Rice, who may not have been the most talented player in the draft, but whose legendary work ethic led him to greatness. In coverage of the NBA (or NFL) draft every year, it seems that one word keeps popping up over and over again in profiles of the players. Which young musician would you choose to accept? Upside The only difference is that one seems to be more naturally gifted, while the other, who is still talented of course, appears to have gotten to where they are through great dedication and hard work. They’re both the same age, and both excellent and accomplished players already who play at the same level. Let’s say that you have only one opening in your teaching studio, but two students who want to study with you.

Music prodigy vs smart music